Filing Guide June 2026 · 8 min read

Nice Class 18 — Leather Goods, Bags & Luggage Trademark Guide

How to trademark a handbag, luggage, or leather-goods brand in Nice Class 18. What it covers, why fashion brands pair it with Class 25, and how trade dress protects the shape of an iconic bag.

T
tmarkmetric Editorial
Based on USPTO public data
Key Facts
Class 18 covers leather and imitation leather, handbags, luggage, wallets, backpacks, and — historically — umbrellas and walking sticks.
Fashion and accessory brands almost always pair Class 18 (bags) with Class 25 (clothing) to cover their full product line.
Iconic bag shapes — the Hermès Birkin, the Bottega Veneta weave — can be protected as trade dress, not just by name.
Louis Vuitton, Hermès, Coach, and Gucci hold some of the most aggressively enforced Class 18 portfolios in the world.
Animal products and pet accessories also fall in Class 18, a frequently overlooked part of the class.

Why does a fashion label's umbrella line and its handbag line file under the same trademark class? A historical accident: 19th-century leather-goods makers also sold umbrellas, parasols, and walking sticks out of the same shops, and the Nice Classification never separated them. Nice Class 18 has carried that quirk ever since, alongside its actual center of gravity — leather and imitation leather, and the handbags, wallets, backpacks, briefcases, and luggage made from it.

The Single Most Common Filing Gap in Fashion

Almost every fashion and accessories brand needs both Class 18 and Class 25, and the single most common mistake founders make is registering only one. Clothing and footwear are Class 25 — even when made of leather, a leather jacket is Class 25, not Class 18, because the class follows the product type, not the material. A brand that files only Class 25 leaves its handbags, wallets, and luggage completely unprotected; a competitor could sell bags under the identical name without technically infringing the clothing mark. Belts sit in the same trap: worn as apparel, they're generally treated as Class 25, even when made of leather.

Our Class 25 clothing guide covers the apparel half of this pairing in depth. Each class carries its own USPTO filing fee, so the decision is really about matching registration to the actual and planned product range — not about avoiding cost by guessing which class matters more.

When the Bag's Shape Is Worth More Than the Name

Some of the most consequential trade-dress cases in all of fashion involve bags rather than logos. The silhouette of the Hermès Birkin and Kelly, the intrecciato weave of Bottega Veneta, and various Louis Vuitton configurations have all been asserted as protectable trade dress — meaning the shape and appearance of the product, independent of any name on it, functions as a source identifier. Registering that kind of protection requires showing the design is non-functional and has acquired distinctiveness, a genuinely high evidentiary bar, but for an iconic accessory it can end up being the most valuable asset a brand owns. Our guide to trade dress protection covers what that evidence actually looks like.

Louis Vuitton's monogram and Damier check, Hermès's bag names and shapes, Coach's signature C pattern, and Gucci's GG monogram and web stripe all sit at this intersection of wordmark and trade dress, and all four run some of the most aggressive enforcement programs in luxury retail.

What People Forget Is Even in This Class

Beyond bags and luggage, Class 18 quietly covers animal collars, leashes, and harnesses — a detail pet-accessory brands need and fashion brands sometimes overlook when they expand into that category. Eyewear cases, meanwhile, typically travel with the eyewear itself into Class 9 rather than staying in Class 18. And "leather goods" as a goods description is too vague on its own — list the specific articles you actually sell rather than relying on a broad catch-all term.

Search registered Class 18 trademarks before you commit to hardware, dust bags, and labels — clearing both Class 18 and Class 25 together up front is far cheaper than rebranding a line that's already launched.

Disclaimer: This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed trademark attorney for guidance specific to your situation.

Continue Reading

More Class Guides