Filing Guide June 2026 · 6 min read

Nice Class 22 — Ropes, Nets & Raw Textile Fibers Trademark Guide

How to trademark a ropes, nets, or raw-fiber brand in Nice Class 22. What it covers, the line with yarns (Class 23) and finished textiles (Class 24), and how industrial cordage brands clear.

T
tmarkmetric Editorial
Based on USPTO public data
Key Facts
Class 22 covers ropes, string, nets, tents, awnings, tarpaulins, sacks, and raw textile fibers.
It sits early in the textile chain: raw fibers are Class 22, spun yarns are Class 23, woven fabric is Class 24.
Padding and stuffing materials and raw fibrous materials for textiles fall here.
Samson Rope Technologies, a major U.S. cordage manufacturer supplying marine, industrial, and rigging rope, is a good example of a brand anchored squarely in Class 22.
B2B and outdoor-gear focused; clearance across the textile-chain classes matters.

Before a fiber becomes fabric, it passes through two other classes first. Nice Class 22 marks the earliest of those stages: raw fibrous textile materials, plus ropes, string, cordage, nets, tents, awnings, tarpaulins, sails, sacks for bulk transport, and padding or stuffing materials. It's a small, mostly industrial class — the marine and outdoor-gear side of the textile world, more than the fashion side.

The Four-Stage Chain That Explains Everything Here

Textiles move through a predictable sequence: raw fiber (Class 22) becomes spun yarn or thread (Class 23), which becomes woven or finished fabric (Class 24), which becomes finished clothing (Class 25). A raw cotton or wool fiber is squarely Class 22; the moment it's spun, it becomes Class 23 instead, and once it's woven into cloth, Class 24. Our Class 23 guide and Class 24 guide pick up where this one leaves off. A vertically integrated textile company might genuinely need all four classes; a specialist rope or tarp maker files only in Class 22 and stops there.

An Industrial Class With an Outdoor-Gear Exception

Most of the names anchoring Class 22 aren't consumer brands at all. Samson Rope Technologies, a long-established U.S. cordage manufacturer supplying marine rigging, industrial lifting, and towing applications, sits squarely in this territory — its product names live in rope-and-cordage terms rather than anywhere near the finished-textile classes. Tarpaulin and cover manufacturers, tent and awning brands, and raw-fiber suppliers round out the rest of the class. The outdoor-gear sector is the exception that brings genuine consumer-facing branding to an otherwise heavily B2B category — tents, camping tarps, and hammocks are the products where an ordinary shopper actually encounters a Class 22 name on a shelf.

A few classification traps worth flagging: sporting nets, like those used in fishing tackle, can actually be Class 28 rather than Class 22. Sacks and bags for bulk transport are Class 22, but that's a different category from handbags and luggage, which are Class 18 — the distinction is industrial bulk carrying versus consumer carry goods, not "bag" as a single concept.

A Class Full of Rope, Net, and Canvas Brand Names

Because Class 22 skews industrial, the naming conventions differ from the consumer-facing textile classes further down the chain. Marine cordage brands lean on strength and reliability cues — words that signal load rating, weather resistance, or rigging pedigree — rather than lifestyle branding. Tent and tarp makers sit closer to the outdoor-consumer world and borrow more from Class 25's naming instincts, using rugged, expedition-flavored names that a camper actually remembers at a retail counter. A single company occasionally spans both registers: a cordage manufacturer that also sells a consumer line of tarps and hammocks may want one name for the trade-facing rope catalog and a distinct sub-brand for the retail-facing outdoor line, filed separately so each can be positioned for its actual audience.

A Common Filing Mistake: Treating "Textile" as One Category

The single most frequent error founders make with Class 22 is assuming that because a product is "made of fiber," any fiber-related trademark filing can go here. It can't. The USPTO's classification isn't organized around material composition the way a shopper might expect — it's organized around what stage of processing the goods have reached and what function they perform. A raw fiber bale is Class 22. A finished canvas tarp is also Class 22, because it's a finished good made from raw or minimally processed material rather than woven cloth. But a woven canvas tote bag is Class 18, because "bag" pulls it into the carrying-goods category regardless of the canvas fabric it's built from. This is exactly the kind of overlap that trips up applicants who file based on material rather than function, and it's worth spending the extra ten minutes checking the actual identification-of-goods language the USPTO accepts for Class 22 before submitting, rather than assuming a description that worked for a Class 24 filing will transfer cleanly.

Search registered Class 22 trademarks before you file, and check the neighboring Class 23 and 24 registers if your business spans more than one stage of the textile chain.

Disclaimer: This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed trademark attorney for guidance specific to your situation.

Continue Reading

More Class Guides